I still remember that afternoon in 2014 with startling clarity. A smooth, dull-white sphere hovered against a backdrop of clouds and blue sky — unmoving, despite a stiff wind rattling everything else. I first thought: balloon. But as I watched, the sphere began to dart and bounce — hundreds of feet in multiple directions, like a ping-pong ball struck with ferocious speed. No wings. No exhaust. Then, in a flash, it shot straight up, as if fired from a gun. To top it off, there were many other objects in the air, birds, Cessna’s, 737’s, all normal in the busy San Jose airspace, all operating normally, but this, this thing, this was not “normal”.
At the time I didn’t know what it was. But I knew what I saw. And years later, after conducting thousands of investigations for Fortune 500 companies, and having served 8 years in the Marines, I understand something about evidence, patterns, anomalies, and when things don’t add up. Before that, I was flying — trained in Cessnas, and even worked for a time around F/A-18s at Naval Air Station Lemoore. In other words: I’m familiar with aircraft. I know what operates, how it behaves — and what doesn’t.
My background gives me a unique vantage point. If something in the sky behaves like nothing I’ve ever studied — no contrails, no aerodynamic surfaces, no propulsion, yet it performs impossible maneuvers and vanishes — I can’t chalk it up to a balloon or drone. What I saw demanded explanation.
For years I tried to dismiss it. But the memory refused to fade. Then, in 2017, when the three UAP videos saw the light of day in the New York Times, and the world began to treat such stories with seriousness, I dove into the growing body of research — reports, whistleblower statements, official documents, pilot testimonies — and discovered a mosaic slowly forming. The more pieces I added, the more real the picture began to look: this wasn’t just misidentified aircraft or hallucinations. Something strange — perhaps far stranger — had visited our skies.
Why The Age of Disclosure Changed the Game — and Resonates with My Experience
With the release of The Age of Disclosure, the conversation has shifted dramatically. The film presents testimony from 34 former U.S. government, military, and intelligence-community insiders. The claims are bold: recovered craft, non-human intelligent life, decades of cover-ups, and reverse-engineering programs whose fruits have been hidden from the public.
As someone trained to evaluate threats, anomalies, patterns — the idea of a “legacy program” hiding non-human technology resonates as plausible. The film doesn’t present blurry YouTube clips or speculative interviews — it features people who once held security clearances, once were the gate-keepers of classified data, now coming forward. That alone raises my antennae.
Director Dan Farah— speaking about why he does the film — said that every single person he interviewed “made it very clear that it was no longer a question of whether this was a real situation… It’s a very real situation.” When a trained investigator hears something like that from people whose jobs were to suppress and protect classified intelligence, it demands attention.
Voices from the Documentary — Echoes of What I Witnessed
Some of the statements in The Age of Disclosure are haunting, others electrifying. The ones that struck me hardest are those that mirror what I saw overhead.
Senator Marco Rubio — now involved in the conversation at high levels — warns about the seriousness of UAP activity near protected sites:
“We’ve had repeated instances of something operating in the airspace over restricted nuclear facilities — and it’s not ours. And we don’t know whose it is.”
That’s not a balloon. That’s not a weather-phenomenon.
Then there’s Jay Stratton — former Defense Intelligence Agency official and key figure in the government’s UAP Task Force — who doesn’t hedge. He says plainly:
“I have seen with my own eyes non-human craft and non-human beings.”
And he warns of what’s at stake:
“The first country that cracks the code on this technology will be the leader for years to come. This is similar to the Manhattan Project; this is the atomic weapon on steroids.”
Then there’s Lue Elizondo — once inside the belly of the beast: a former top-level Pentagon official tied to the government’s UAP programs — claiming that the U.S. government has long been involved in “a secret war” to retrieve and reverse-engineer what are allegedly non-human vehicles.
When you combine those testimonies with what I once saw — a craft that made no aerodynamic sense, moved unlike any airplane or drone, then vanished — I start seeing threads connect in ways that demand more than skepticism: demand answers.
Why So Much Smoke — And So Few Sparks the Public Can See
In my 20-plus years as a Global Security Professional, leading corporate investigations, I’ve learned a simple rule: where there’s smoke, there is almost always fire … or at least a spark. And when the fire is big — national security-size — the sparks are often hidden, buried, reclassified, or erased.
I know how organizations operate under secrecy. I know how evidence gets compartmentalized. I know how people at the top decide what gets shared.
So when insiders in The Age of Disclosure speak of a “legacy program,” classified craft, reverse-engineering, and a history of suppression — I don’t just hear conjecture. I hear echoes of patterns I’ve chased before. Patterns where anomalies were real, evidence existed, and only those deep inside the system knew the truth.
It’s frustrating — maddening even — because if these programs exist, the public deserves to know. As someone who’s spent decades as a corporate investigator and mitigating hidden risk, I understand the responsibility. If these claims are true — about non-human intelligence, about craft, technology, biologics — they aren’t just fringe conspiracies. They’re existential questions for humanity.
What This Means — For Me, For You, and for the World
Reading those testimonies, recalling my own skyward encounter, I feel a sense of tectonic possibility. If even a portion of what’s claimed in The Age of Disclosure is accurate — non-human craft, non-human beings, recovered technology beyond our science — then we’re not dealing with UFOs in the old mythic sense. We’re dealing with something far more serious: a paradigm-shifting reality.
Technology that defies current physics. Craft that whisper of propulsion systems beyond combustion or lift. Presence around strategic military and nuclear sites — not just as curiosity, but perhaps as surveillance, or observation, or something beyond our comprehension.
The implications ripple outward: geopolitics, national security, global power balance, ethics, faith, science — and the sheer essence of what it means to be human.
Why I Write This — And Why You Should Care
I write this not only because I once saw something unknown, but because I increasingly believe we are on the edge of a transformation — a long-delayed reckoning with truths we were never meant to know. The Age of Disclosure may not hand us an alien body or show us unassailable crash-site footage. But in its testimonies, in the words of former insiders, it holds a mirror up to decades of silence — and asks us whether we are ready to look.
If these voices are telling even half of what they say — the demand for transparency isn’t fringe. It’s urgency. It’s moral. It’s global.
So to you — whoever reads this — ask questions. Demand answers. Stay curious. Stay open. Because maybe, just maybe, the object I saw all those years ago was not the exception. Maybe it was the signal.